Making my 2015 new year cards

Getting the data

For this year’s greeting cards I had decided to take a radical turn from my previous 2 greeting cards projects which were entirely based on data from interaction with whomever was getting the card and just focus on creating something closer to generative art. I decided to use people’s names as the basis of the shape I would use. The other departure I took from my previous project is that I wanted to send physical cards. I also like the idea of the cards being a surprise, so I didn’t want to tell people “hey, I’m going to generate a card from your name. Can you give me your address?” Instead, I set up a google form and asked people several questions.

What is their name (obviously)? What is their address? How long have they lived here? What is their home town? Where were they born? What is their birthday? and finally, I gave them the chance to write whatever they want.

While I always thought I would only use name + address to create the cards, I also wanted to make a visualization on the ensemble of people who would fill my form, and among other things I thought of a map of where my friends are versus where they are from.

I sent about 300 messages asking people to fill the form, and got about 100 replies. The form was also a way to commit to do that project… Because I proposed to so many people to get a card, there was no way I could back off afterwards 🙂 whereas if I had just created something online and sent it via mail, I could have definitely stopped mid-way.

Layer as tiles

I was pretty much set on creating cards as a layer of tiles from the get go. Each word in a person’s name could be a layer, and each letter could be an attribute. Attributes could change things like patterns, colors, size, orientation, all kind of things! Eventually I decided to use the 5 first letters of people’s names, and only use 2 layers, even if the person’s first name (or last name) is composed of two or more words.

When designing patterns, I wanted something that could tile on a card. Squares, while not the only possibility, were the easiest. So I started to come up with many patterns that could be placed on squares and that would tile (ie the right of one pattern would connect with its left end, and the top to its bottom). I decided (arbitrarily) that both the height and width would scale together, as opposed to vary independently (turning the squares into rectangles). Also, I wanted two colors per layer, but one would be more prominently used than the other. Finally, I allowed the layers to be rotated as opposed to be necessarily strictly parallel to the borders of the card.

Since words are made of letters, I went for simplicity. There would be 5 attributes (pattern, main color, secondary color, scale and orientation), and for each one, each of the 26 possible letters corresponded to one value. And while there were “only” 26 possible patterns, I experimented much much more – possibly 100 or so.

Letters as patterns

My patterns fell in several categories. There were very simple geometric shapes (A, G, I, O, R). Some were hand-drawn (L and S). Some were more sophisticated geometric shapes (B, D, E, F, H, J, K, M, P, V, W, Y). Finally, some were inspired by islamic art (C, N, Z).

Finally, there are some letters I didn’t assign patterns to, because there was just no name starting with those letters in my dataset 🙂 (Q, U and X).

In my explorations / experimentations one thing I kept in mind was the weight of the pattern. The M, or the O, for instance, are really light. But the K or the F are heavier. I tend to attribute the lighter patterns to letters that started first names, while giving the heavier patterns to letters that mostly started last names (and were in the back).

Pinterest was a great source of inspiration for patterns. At some point in the process I really wanted to use islamic patterns. I have a couple of books on the subject and I always really liked their look and feel, their “tileliness” and also that they are built with ruler and compass. Many of these patterns, even if very intricate, can easily be reproduced with computers (ie, drawing an hexagon requires using a compass 7 times, but with a computer all you need to do is compute the cosine and sine of 6 points and link them). And I thought there was beauty in the process of building them. So I created an ‘islamic pattern builder” as a side project – which will get its own blog post.

Here is a slightly modified card maker compared to the one I used (it only exports a card in 600×1080 as opposed to 1875 x 3375)

Wrapping it up

Eventually I put together the cards. Minor setback – I don’t have a color printer at home, so I would have to have the cards printed. Since I had to use a vendor anyway, I thought I might as well look for someone who could also send them, and that’s how I ended up choosing allowed me to send 6×11″ cards which seemed cool (although, to be honest, I didn’t have a good sense of how big that was) and took as input 300 dpi png bitmaps. So I had to create 3375 x 1875 images, that’s up to 10 Mb per card! I initially hesitated between creating my cards with d3 and processing and chose d3 because it was easier for me to manipulate shapes using svg. I soon regretted that decision because exporting large bitmaps is not easy from the browser. Chrome won’t let you do that – exporting a png over a certain size (I think 2.56mb) will crash it. So my way around it was to export it as webp, chrome’s preferred compression format (which was with one exception always below its threshold) and then, convert them to png. Then, we ran into some unexpected issues and delays 🙂 but eventually all the cards were sent and people are telling me that they are getting them 🙂

Making the ensemble visualization

I always intended to show things about all the cards. But I also wanted to keep all the information that had been shared with me private. I made the front side of the cards public in a pinterest board but it would be really difficult to reverse engineer them to come up with a name. I made a map, by geocoding all the information I was given, but I also clustered all of the addresses and rounded all geocoding, so it’s not possible to go from one of the pixels of the map (or the data file) to an actual address.

I also contributed the visualization I had made to show the distribution of names and initials.

I was conflicted about whether using what people shared with me in the free text section of my form. On one hand, I wanted to find a way to show it, but on the other, showing even fractions of a phrase would challenge the confidentiality of what was written. But still, I wanted to restitute what I was given. Some of the text that was sent to me was really awesome. So I opted for a word cloud kind of setting. This is the first time since word clouds have gained mainstream acceptance that I used one 🙂 I thought it was appropriate – I’d show only words, not phrases. Also the aesthetics was interesting – with only 2 angles (0 or 30 degrees) and a cool set of colors. I’m using Jason Davies wordcloud generator for d3.

And there you have it – here’s the final visualization.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *